Persidangan Antarabangsa Kepimpinan Sekolah Pulau: Memperkasa Kepimpinan Digital & Kolaboratif Sekolah Pulau ke Arah Pendidikan Mampan, Selamat, dan Inklusif (PAKSI 2026)

General Guidelines for Writing Best Practice Abstract

Abstract – A concise and brief synopsis of the article. It should include aspects of the project name, organizational background, issues (problems and potential), rationale, aims and objectives, project activities, and summary.

General Guidelines for Writing Action Research Abstract

Abstract – A concise and brief synopsis of the article. It should include aspects of reflection, research issue/focus, research objectives, target group, research implementation, and suggestions for further research.

Format for Writing Action Research & Best Practice Abstract
• If the article is written in Malay, the abstract should also be written in Malay or vice versa.
• not exceeding 150 words
• Italic format
• font size 10
• justified
Keywords – Authors need to include between three (3) to five (5) keywords placed below the abstract. Written using font size 10 and the words 'kata kunci' (keywords) written in italic.

General Guidelines for Writing Fundamental Research Abstract

Title
• The title should be concise, informative, and reflect the main focus of the study.
• Use Title Case, Times New Roman, 14 pt, Bold, and centered
Abstract
• The abstract must be written in English or Bahasa Melayu
• Length: 230–250 words.
• Format: Single paragraph.
• Font: Times New Roman, 10 pt.
• Line spacing: Single (1.0).
• Alignment: Justified.
• The abstract should briefly include: Background and research problem, Objective(s), Methodology, Key findings (or expected findings), Conclusion and contribution/ implication for further research.
• Do not include references, citations, tables, figures, equations, footnotes, or unexplained abbreviations.
Keywords
• Provide 3–5 keywords immediately after the abstract.
• Separate keywords with semicolons (;).
Blind Review Requirement
• The abstract must not contain any information that identifies the author(s) or their institution(s).
• Do not include author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, funding information, project names, ORCID iDs, or self-identifying statements (e.g., "at our university" or "in our previous work").
• The review process will follow a double-blind peer review, where the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.